1. Welcome to the Southern Oregon RC forums.
    Dismiss Notice

Meshing Rotors Concept

Discussion in 'Helicopters' started by w00d, Aug 23, 2012.

  1. w00d

    w00d Registered

    Messages:
    1,787
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    New Toronto, Ontario, Great White North, Ay
  2. GPS

    GPS Registered

    Messages:
    9,095
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Grants Pass, Oregon
    Pretty cool.  Do you really need a tail boom on those?
  3. Pelagic Pilot

    Pelagic Pilot Registered

    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oregon
    That's cool, don't really need a tail boom, but makes it look cool  8)
  4. highlandcrawler

    highlandcrawler Registered

    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    That is pretty crazy. It started to make me dizzy/sick watching it spool up though lol. Being as I don't really know a lot about them is there anything about this that makes it superior to a conventional main motor and tail? What is the benefit or drawback to something like this? Or am I missing the whole thing all together and its not really a helicopter but a multirotor :-[
  5. Pelagic Pilot

    Pelagic Pilot Registered

    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Oregon
    Long history with those, look up Flettner FL282. First production helicopter was this design. The Kaman KMAX currently made is a heavy lift helicopter for logging. It also the first ever full scale RC helicopter to see actual war time use for external load operations. The rail rotor uses power from the engine that does not go to lift. All the power from this goes to lift since no tail rotor needed.

Share This Page