Read more and see photos via the source link. Source: http://gizmodo.com/gopro-hero-3-hands-on-a-nice-bump-but-not-a-jump-1431861328
haha, I was just this second considering letting y'all know about the release of GoPro Hero 3+. ... but before I did I thought I'd better do a SORC search first ... LOL and HERE I find myself
Re: "Did you hear about the rumor about the 4k GoPro?" Nope, NOT yet ... But honestly I'm NOT a big fan of the GoPro line, actually NOT a FAN of ANY Sport Cam for Aerial Phot ... but I thought the 3+ was worth mentioning because I knows allot does like GoPro ... But (LOL) I wouldn't mind an high end (4K)monitor for my pictures, the prices on those are getting better But, But, But -w00d...
Here: http://southernoregonrc.com/index.p...-4-4k-30-fps-1080p-120-fps-720p-240-fps.3942/ Fan or not, those are some respectable specs, especially for a Sport Cam. Speaking of 4K monitors, I saw a 65" Seiki television that they claim will become available this year for *only* $3000. I guess that's pretty inexpensive for a large size television monitor, however the frame rate is only 30 FPS @ 4K so that is pretty lame actually. That plus the fact that there isn't any content or reasonable delivery system yet for 4K. That being said, I could also benefit from a computer monitor that could display a 4K horizontal image. So far the nicest screen I've seen is the 27" Apple Cinema display which can do 2560x1440. A pair of those would be cool. On the other hand I'm doing OK with my current dual screen setup:
Yeah, I just tossed out the 4K number !?! but I'm actually looking at any monitor with an higher Gamut (more colours) than I have currently. But, But, But -w00d...
I'm satisfied with the color gamut of these for both photo and video editing. I believe that Apple handles color better than Windows anyway.
Colour is determined by hardware, video card and the monitor it's viewed on. The operating system then colour manages those by loading the preferred Colour Space, usually sRGB or Adobe RGB 1998 (Windows defaults to sRGB). My guess is Apples uses Adobe RGB 1998 which theoretically has a larger Color Gamut but you need a monitor able to produce it's range of colours. Those who know and understand Colour Management, will choose which, sRGB or Adobe RGB 1998, Linux is not colour managed. Nevertheless monitors at the consumer level are hardly able produce the colours available with sRGB whose colour Gamut is smaller than Adobe RGB 1998's ... The monitors I'm looking at are professional photo/video editing monitors which have the ability to reproduce 97% of the Adobe RGB 1998 (Adobe RGB: 97%, 102% vs. NTSC, 1.07 billion from a palette of 278 trillion) Colour Gmaut. For a good monitor of this caliber were talking on average for a 27" $2500 which is not too bad as it wasn't long ago they were $5000. We also need a GPU which support 10-bit output with the monitor. Also remember the video performance is not as important to me as accurate colour thus my mistake when I said 4K. As it is now my monitor is not capable of showing all the colours my (or anyone's) cameras is able to produce nor able to be seen in print. ...
